Citizens Initiative Review

Opinion: Citizen Initiative Review Commissions Provide Deeper Involvement in Democracy

In the Press /

Guest opinion article written by Sue Malek for the Missoulian: Should we enact Citizen Initiative Review Commissions (CIRCs)* in Montana? A bipartisan bill in the Oregon Legislature established CIRCs in 2008. Twenty-four citizens, randomly selected to serve, are paid salaries and expenses for participation in groups that study initiative issues and publish a statement describing […]

Opinion: Citizen Initiative Review Commissions Provide Deeper Involvement in Democracy Read More »

Podcast // Facilitating Public Deliberation: Episode 32, Citizens’ Initiative Reviews with Linn Davis

Podcasts /

From Facilitating Public Deliberation: Linn Davis leads Healthy Democracy’s program development and process design. He coordinates Healthy Democracy’s complex public processes, trains its facilitation teams, and consults on deliberative projects in the U.S. and abroad. In this episode, recorded prior to the pandemic’s impact, Linn explains the Citizens’ Initiative Review (CIR) and the skills needed for excellent facilitation

Podcast // Facilitating Public Deliberation: Episode 32, Citizens’ Initiative Reviews with Linn Davis Read More »

Citizens’ Initiative Review: Helping Citizens Make Better Informed Voting Choices

In the Press /

From medium.com/participo: Linn Davis is a program manager at Healthy Democracy, a US-based nonpartisan non-profit that designs and coordinates deliberative democracy programs. He manages the Citizens’ Initiative Review program, as well as design and outreach for emerging local government and high school programs. The Citizens’ Initiative Review is a unique deliberative process. In the OECD’s forthcoming

Citizens’ Initiative Review: Helping Citizens Make Better Informed Voting Choices Read More »

Practical Values for Virtual Participation

Blog, News /

Everyone is talking about online engagement these days. Yes, those are eight different links to eight different articles, all from one quick dive into social media this morning.   There is so much being written, in fact – so many weeds to get into – that I hope we don’t lose sight of a bigger picture, of what is important in planning for online deliberation. With

Practical Values for Virtual Participation Read More »

Citizens’ Initiative Review Needs Legislative Funding

Blog, News /

The Oregon legislature just started their short session on February 1. Senator Arnie Roblan, who sponsored the bill that put the Citizens’ Initiative Review in statute, is proposing that the legislature commit funds to ensure this uniquely Oregon innovation in democracy can be sustained. His OpEd appears below: Oregon was one of the first states

Citizens’ Initiative Review Needs Legislative Funding Read More »

Podcast // Democracy Nerd: Exploring Oregon-Style Democracy

Podcasts /

From Democracy Nerd: In this episode, Jefferson Smith talks with Linn Davis, Healthy Democracy Program Manager. Linn oversees the Citizens Initiative Review, in which Oregon voters deliberate a ballot initiative and provide a statement for the voters’ pamphlet. The use of citizens’ juries to weigh in on public policy has been exported to other states

Podcast // Democracy Nerd: Exploring Oregon-Style Democracy Read More »

From ancient Athens to the town hall: Can a new wave of deliberative democracy save the world?

In the Press /

From Salon: . . . What’s a good regional example? At the regional/state level, it is worth highlighting the impact of the Citizens’ Initiative Review (CIR) model, which has been institutionalized in Oregon — and is now required before a ballot measure — and has been piloted in numerous other states, as well as in Finland and

From ancient Athens to the town hall: Can a new wave of deliberative democracy save the world? Read More »

Swiss town tests citizen panel to help voters analyse information

In the Press /

From swissinfo.ch: The municipality of Sion in southwestern Switzerland is planning a participative democracy experiment, first tried out in the US state of Oregon, that places randomly selected locals on a citizen panel in the lead up to national referendums. Various inhabitants of the canton Valais municipality will be asked to form a citizen panel that

Swiss town tests citizen panel to help voters analyse information Read More »

Citizens’ Juries – providing a neutral recommendation on voting issues

In the Press /

From swissinfo.ch: In Switzerland, issues up for vote are typically complex and the interests of different parties are often difficult to decipher. One solution could be the use of a citizens’ jury whereby a few citizens are selected at random to provide a balanced assessment of voting issues for the many. The random selection of

Citizens’ Juries – providing a neutral recommendation on voting issues Read More »

Lawmakers Consider Including ‘Citizens’ Statements’ In The State’s Voter Guide

In the Press /

From WGBH News:  Across the state, in mailboxes, libraries and lobbies, there are stacks of Massachusetts voter guides. The red booklet from the Secretary of State’s office summarizes Massachusetts’ three ballot questions, with blurbs from the pro and con campaigns. Next election, there may be something new included in those packets. Lawmakers are considering legislation that

Lawmakers Consider Including ‘Citizens’ Statements’ In The State’s Voter Guide Read More »

Massachusetts: State lawmakers working to make ballot questions more clear to voters

In the Press, News /

From WWLP 22 News: BOSTON (WWLP) – State lawmakers are working to make voting easier on election day. Ballot questions can be confusing, sometimes making it unclear what your ‘yes’ or ‘no’ vote actually means. State lawmakers have a proposal that could change where your information comes from. More than 50 state lawmakers support a bill

Massachusetts: State lawmakers working to make ballot questions more clear to voters Read More »

Can Citizen Governance Save Our Republic?

In the Press, News /

From Governing magazine: . . . Other states have taken their own steps to amplify citizen voices and drown out special interests. In 2011, the Oregon legislature established a Citizens Initiative Review Commission that convenes panels of 18 to 24 randomly selected citizens who, along with experts, collaboratively evaluate the facts and ramifications of pending ballot

Can Citizen Governance Save Our Republic? Read More »